The latest research carried out by the Chartered Management Institute has found that the pay gap between male and female executives is at its highest yet with men earning on average £10,500 more than women. Male executives are earning £42,441/year on average and their female counterparts are taking home an average of £31,895. This gap has actually grown in the last 2 years and is especially evident in IT and Retail.
In addition at the top level of pay, not only do women earn considerable less than their male counterparts but their jobs are more vulnerable too. This is particularly worrying since there is wide consensus that the UK needs more women on the boards of British Companies. Following a government enquiry into just this topic earlier this year, the 30% club has been set up to bring about a substantial increase in the number of women given the opportunity to serve on company boards.
It is now 41 years since equal pay legislation was passed. But these figures clearly show that the law is not protecting women’s pay. At the current trajectory, it will take nearly 100 years for women’s pay to catch up. One argument is to take another look at how maternity/paternity leave is granted in order to remove the built-in disadvantage that faces women. However maternity breaks do not entirely explain the pay gap. Trade Unions have argued that there are particular categories of work which are done by women and the pay grades set for these jobs then create these differences. This is especially the case in some public sectors – the NHS – for example.
But other campaigners argue that is the way that the legislation is framed that is the problem. If an individual woman thinks she is paid less than her male counterpart, she has to find clear evidence of discrimination. This can be hard to come by as employers are no obliged to publish rates of pay. Some campaigners are arguing that companies which employ more than two hundred and fifty workers should be obliged to publish average pay rates for both their male and female employees.
So far, at least, the Government shows no sign of wishing to force companies to publish average pay levels comparing the sexes. Maybe the longer term solution is for more women to get into senior positions in companies, so gaining the power to make equal pay happen. But whether that will take 98 years remains to be seen.
What do you think?


